<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why FriendFeed&#8217;s Redesign Is A Step In The Right Direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanchase.com/2009/04/5-reasons-why-friendfeeds-redesign-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanchase.com/2009/04/5-reasons-why-friendfeeds-redesign-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/</link>
	<description>The portfolio, resume, and blog of Nathan Chase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 12:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://nathanchase.com/2009/04/5-reasons-why-friendfeeds-redesign-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanchase.com/?p=445#comment-382</guid>
		<description>An excellent post Nathan. You have a new subscriber sir!

BTW: I found the post via (you&#039;ve guessed it) FriendFeed beta.

Jim Connolly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent post Nathan. You have a new subscriber sir!</p>
<p>BTW: I found the post via (you&#8217;ve guessed it) FriendFeed beta.</p>
<p>Jim Connolly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abdellah</title>
		<link>http://nathanchase.com/2009/04/5-reasons-why-friendfeeds-redesign-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>abdellah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanchase.com/?p=445#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I enjoyed you post, and I agree with you at a point , there is just one point that I disagree with you :

in your refinement suggestion :

&quot;better user management that allows for sorting your friends by level of engagement&quot;

such feature may induce a subclass users, that may be induce some negativity and users conflict., I enjoy the current FF users management, hope they will not opt for a kind of Twitter user Management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I enjoyed you post, and I agree with you at a point , there is just one point that I disagree with you :</p>
<p>in your refinement suggestion :</p>
<p>&#8220;better user management that allows for sorting your friends by level of engagement&#8221;</p>
<p>such feature may induce a subclass users, that may be induce some negativity and users conflict., I enjoy the current FF users management, hope they will not opt for a kind of Twitter user Management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

